When the Impact
study surveyed 37,000 consumers across the United States about their
local newspapers, it found many ways for newspapers to increase readership.
Almost every kind of improvement in service, editorial quality, brand
perception and advertising quality has the potential to increase customer
satisfaction and readership.
But the real challenge isn't coming up
with areas to improve, but in prioritizing
improvements to make the most of limited
resources. If you can't do everything, how
do you decide what's most important?
The Readership Institute decided to prioritize
opportunities by their potential to get people
to actually read the newspaper more. Where
will improvements motivate people to spend
more time with the newspaper and read more
sections more often? These ratings are called
opportunity scores.
Not surprisingly, some opportunities have
more potential than others. Overall, service
has great potential to improve newspaper
readership. Compared to editorial content,
brand perception, and advertising content,
the opportunity potential for service is
the highest of all areas. If we look at the
individual items related to service, the
condition and completeness of the newspaper
has the greatest potential. This list of
service factors is by no means exhaustive
and the Readership Institute is conducting
ongoing research to further explore how to
improve customer service.
We found these opportunity scores to be
remarkably consistent across U.S. newspapers.
Regardless of circulation size or market
circumstance, the relative rankings of each
opportunity remain the same. This consistency
means that any newspaper can implement these
changes with confidence that the instructions
apply to it.
The opportunity scores themselves have
no inherent meaning — they are relative
scores used to rank areas. Differences of
three to four points in an opportunity score
also aren't meaningful. Focus on the overall
rank of opportunities and differences of
more than five points.
| |
Opportunity
Scores |
| Service
Area |
Overall |
Men |
Women |
| Condition & completeness
of paper |
65 |
87 |
87 |
| Quality of paper, ink & typesize |
59 |
81 |
75 |
| When and how the paper
is delivered |
58 |
83 |
71 |
| Accuracy of the bill |
56 |
76 |
71 |
| Cost of home delivery |
55 |
77 |
70 |
| Customer service |
55 |
74 |
70 |
| |
Opportunity
Scores |
| Service
Area |
Overall |
Age
18-34 |
Age
35-54 |
Age
55+ |
| Condition & completeness
of paper |
65 |
61 |
81 |
101 |
| Quality of paper, ink & typesize |
59 |
67 |
77 |
81 |
| When and how the paper
is delivered |
58 |
57 |
70 |
93 |
| Accuracy of the bill |
56 |
53 |
64 |
96 |
| Cost of home delivery |
55 |
57 |
66 |
89 |
| Customer service |
55 |
52 |
66 |
88 |
| |
Opportunity
Scores |
| Service
Area |
Overall |
Black |
Hispanic |
White |
| Condition & completeness
of paper |
65 |
75 |
51 |
88 |
| Quality
of paper, ink & typesize |
59 |
70 |
66 |
79 |
| When
and how the paper is delivered |
58 |
37 |
66 |
79 |
| Accuracy
of the bill |
56 |
30 |
53 |
77 |
| Cost
of home delivery |
55 |
32 |
62 |
75 |
| Customer
service |
55 |
35 |
43 |
76 |