Media Management Center      MediaInfoCenter      McCormick Fellows      Kellogg School of Management      Medill

High Potential Service Areas
When the Impact study surveyed 37,000 consumers across the United States about their local newspapers, it found many ways for newspapers to increase readership. Almost every kind of improvement in service, editorial quality, brand perception and advertising quality has the potential to increase customer satisfaction and readership.

But the real challenge isn't coming up with areas to improve, but in prioritizing improvements to make the most of limited resources. If you can't do everything, how do you decide what's most important?

The Readership Institute decided to prioritize opportunities by their potential to get people to actually read the newspaper more. Where will improvements motivate people to spend more time with the newspaper and read more sections more often? These ratings are called opportunity scores.

Not surprisingly, some opportunities have more potential than others. Overall, service has great potential to improve newspaper readership. Compared to editorial content, brand perception, and advertising content, the opportunity potential for service is the highest of all areas. If we look at the individual items related to service, the condition and completeness of the newspaper has the greatest potential. This list of service factors is by no means exhaustive and the Readership Institute is conducting ongoing research to further explore how to improve customer service.

We found these opportunity scores to be remarkably consistent across U.S. newspapers. Regardless of circulation size or market circumstance, the relative rankings of each opportunity remain the same. This consistency means that any newspaper can implement these changes with confidence that the instructions apply to it.

The opportunity scores themselves have no inherent meaning — they are relative scores used to rank areas. Differences of three to four points in an opportunity score also aren't meaningful. Focus on the overall rank of opportunities and differences of more than five points.


 
Opportunity Scores
Service Area
Overall
Men
Women
Condition & completeness of paper
65
87
87
Quality of paper, ink & typesize
59
81
75
When and how the paper is delivered
58
83
71
Accuracy of the bill
56
76
71
Cost of home delivery
55
77
70
Customer service
55
74
70


 
Opportunity Scores
Service Area
Overall
Age 18-34
Age 35-54
Age 55+
Condition & completeness of paper
65
61
81
101
Quality of paper, ink & typesize
59
67
77
81
When and how the paper is delivered
58
57
70
93
Accuracy of the bill
56
53
64
96
Cost of home delivery
55
57
66
89
Customer service
55
52
66
88


 
Opportunity Scores
Service Area
Overall
Black
Hispanic
White
Condition & completeness of paper
65
75
51
88
Quality of paper, ink & typesize
59
70
66
79
When and how the paper is delivered
58
37
66
79
Accuracy of the bill
56
30
53
77
Cost of home delivery
55
32
62
75
Customer service
55
35
43
76


Additional Information

©2009 Readership Institute • 301 Fisk Hall • Northwestern University • 1845 Sheridan Road • Evanston, IL 60208-2110
phone: 847.491.9900 • fax: 847.491.5619 • email: institute@readership.org