When
the Impact study surveyed 37,000 consumers across the United States
about their local newspapers, it found many ways for newspapers to increase
readership. Almost every kind of improvement in service, editorial quality,
brand perception and advertising quality has the potential to increase
customer satisfaction and readership.
But
the real challenge isn't coming up with areas to improve, but in prioritizing
improvements to make the most of limited resources. If you can't do
everything, how do you decide what's most important?
The
Readership Institute decided to prioritize opportunities by their potential
to get people to actually read the newspaper more. Where will improvements
motivate people to spend more time with the newspaper and read more
sections more often? These ratings are called opportunity scores.
Not surprisingly, some opportunities have more potential than others.
Automotive coverage, for example, has a lower opportunity score than
business coverage. In literal terms, this says that increasing satisfaction
with business coverage is more likely to increase readership than increasing
satisfaction with automotive coverage. If you think about it, it makes
sense. Even if most newspapers offered encyclopedic automotive coverage
written by world-renown experts, most readers would still only spend
a few minutes each day reading it.
We found that advertising content has great potential to increase readership.
This is not the same as saying that people buy newspapers to read the
advertisements - a truth that the newspaper industry has known for a
long time. We found that readers actually spend more time with the newspaper
and read more sections when they found interesting advertising content.
In fact, editorial content was better-read when the newspaper also had
quality advertising content.
We found these opportunity scores to be remarkably consistent across
U.S. newspapers. Regardless of circulation size or market circumstance,
the relative rankings of each opportunity remain the same. This consistency
means that any newspaper can implement these changes with confidence
that the instructions apply to it.
The opportunity scores themselves have no inherent meaning -- they are
relative scores used to rank areas. Differences of three to four points
in an opportunity score also aren't meaningful. Focus on the overall
rank of opportunities and differences of more than five points.
|
Overall |
Men |
Women |
| Easy
to Read Content* |
67 |
74 |
75 |
| Community
announcements, obituaries, ordinary people |
64 |
65 |
75 |
| Health,
home, food, fashion & travel |
57 |
59 |
66 |
| Government,
war, politics, international |
53 |
63 |
52 |
| Natural
disasters/accidents |
51 |
58 |
52 |
| Movies,
TV, weather |
50 |
54 |
54 |
| Business,
economics, personal finance |
46 |
55 |
48 |
| Science,
technology, environment |
46 |
51 |
49 |
| Police,
crime, courts, legal |
44 |
52 |
45 |
| Sports |
44 |
53 |
43 |
| Education |
43 |
45 |
47 |
| Parenting,
relationships, religion |
39 |
42 |
41 |
| Arts |
30 |
32 |
34 |
| Automotive |
27 |
34 |
27 |
| Popular
music |
20 |
24 |
20 |
| Jobs
& career |
18 |
22 |
18 |
|
Overall |
Age
18-35 |
Age
36-54 |
Age
55+ |
| Easy
to Read Content* |
67 |
61 |
74 |
76 |
| Community
announcements, obituaries, ordinary people |
64 |
54 |
69 |
73 |
| Health,
home, food, fashion & travel |
57 |
50 |
62 |
64 |
| Government,
war, politics, international |
53 |
44 |
54 |
63 |
| Natural
disasters/accidents |
51 |
37 |
53 |
63 |
| Movies,
TV, weather |
50 |
42 |
53 |
61 |
| Business,
economics, personal finance |
46 |
39 |
50 |
53 |
| Science,
technology, environment |
46 |
39 |
49 |
52 |
| Police,
crime, courts, legal |
44 |
38 |
46 |
52 |
| Sports |
44 |
41 |
47 |
50 |
| Education |
43 |
30 |
48 |
50 |
| Parenting,
relationships, religion |
39 |
33 |
42 |
42 |
| Arts |
30 |
30 |
27 |
37 |
| Automotive |
27 |
23 |
29 |
33 |
| Popular
music |
20 |
22 |
24 |
20 |
| Jobs
& career |
18 |
22 |
31 |
17 |
| Overall |
Black |
Hispanic |
White |
| Easy
to Read Content* |
67 |
74 |
53 |
75 |
| Community
announcements, obituaries, ordinary people |
64 |
69 |
52 |
71 |
| Health,
home, food, fashion & travel |
57 |
70 |
52 |
64 |
| Government,
war, politics, international |
53 |
38 |
40 |
60 |
| Natural
disasters/accidents |
51 |
54 |
34 |
56 |
| Movies,
TV, weather |
50 |
58 |
37 |
56 |
| Business,
economics, personal finance |
46 |
61 |
39 |
51 |
| Science,
technology, environment |
46 |
62 |
22 |
52 |
| Police,
crime, courts, legal |
44 |
45 |
40 |
49 |
| Sports |
44 |
44 |
34 |
49 |
| Education |
43 |
49 |
23 |
48 |
| Parenting,
relationships, religion |
39 |
40 |
23 |
43 |
| Arts |
30 |
27 |
33 |
33 |
| Automotive |
27 |
32 |
22 |
31 |
| Popular
music |
20 |
20 |
14 |
23 |
| Jobs
& career |
18 |
36 |
0 |
21 |
* "Easy to
Read" is both a brand perception and an editorial content quality.
See our Understanding and Improving "Easy to Read" Content page for more information.
|
Overall |
Men |
Women |
| Ad
and inserts for food and groceries |
42 |
44 |
49 |
| Ads
for clothing, health and non-food stores |
42 |
45 |
49 |
| Ads
for entertainment and sporting events |
41 |
49 |
39 |
| Classified
ads |
20 |
26 |
17 |
|
Overall |
Age
18-35 |
Age
36-54 |
Age
55+ |
| Ad
and inserts for food and groceries |
42 |
38 |
40 |
51 |
| Ads
for clothing, health and non-food stores |
42 |
41 |
45 |
47 |
| Ads
for entertainment and sporting events |
41 |
39 |
45 |
44 |
| Classified
ads |
20 |
28 |
29 |
15 |
|
Overall |
Black |
Hispanic |
White |
| Ad
and inserts for food and groceries |
42 |
51 |
46 |
47 |
| Ads
for clothing, health and non-food stores |
42 |
66 |
47 |
47 |
| Ads
for entertainment and sporting events |
41 |
46 |
35 |
47 |
| Classified
ads |
20 |
40 |
14 |
23 |
|
|