Media Management Center      MediaInfoCenter      McCormick Fellows      Kellogg School of Management      Medill

High Potential Content Areas
When the Impact study surveyed 37,000 consumers across the United States about their local newspapers, it found many ways for newspapers to increase readership. Almost every kind of improvement in service, editorial quality, brand perception and advertising quality has the potential to increase customer satisfaction and readership.

But the real challenge isn't coming up with areas to improve, but in prioritizing improvements to make the most of limited resources. If you can't do everything, how do you decide what's most important?

The Readership Institute decided to prioritize opportunities by their potential to get people to actually read the newspaper more. Where will improvements motivate people to spend more time with the newspaper and read more sections more often? These ratings are called opportunity scores.

Not surprisingly, some opportunities have more potential than others. Automotive coverage, for example, has a lower opportunity score than business coverage. In literal terms, this says that increasing satisfaction with business coverage is more likely to increase readership than increasing satisfaction with automotive coverage. If you think about it, it makes sense. Even if most newspapers offered encyclopedic automotive coverage written by world-renown experts, most readers would still only spend a few minutes each day reading it.

We found that advertising content has great potential to increase readership. This is not the same as saying that people buy newspapers to read the advertisements - a truth that the newspaper industry has known for a long time. We found that readers actually spend more time with the newspaper and read more sections when they found interesting advertising content. In fact, editorial content was better-read when the newspaper also had quality advertising content.

We found these opportunity scores to be remarkably consistent across U.S. newspapers. Regardless of circulation size or market circumstance, the relative rankings of each opportunity remain the same. This consistency means that any newspaper can implement these changes with confidence that the instructions apply to it.

The opportunity scores themselves have no inherent meaning -- they are relative scores used to rank areas. Differences of three to four points in an opportunity score also aren't meaningful. Focus on the overall rank of opportunities and differences of more than five points.


Editorial Content

 
Opportunity Scores
Editorial Content Area
Overall
Men
Women
Easy to Read Content*
67
74
75
Community announcements, obituaries, ordinary people
64
65
75
Health, home, food, fashion & travel
57
59
66
Government, war, politics, international
53
63
52
Natural disasters/accidents
51
58
52
Movies, TV, weather
50
54
54
Business, economics, personal finance
46
55
48
Science, technology, environment
46
51
49
Police, crime, courts, legal
44
52
45
Sports
44
53
43
Education
43
45
47
Parenting, relationships, religion
39
42
41
Arts
30
32
34
Automotive
27
34
27
Popular music
20
24
20
Jobs & career
18
22
18



 
Opportunity Scores
Editorial Content Area
Overall
Age 18-35
Age 36-54
Age 55+
Easy to Read Content*
67
61
74
76
Community announcements, obituaries, ordinary people
64
54
69
73
Health, home, food, fashion & travel
57
50
62
64
Government, war, politics, international
53
44
54
63
Natural disasters/accidents
51
37
53
63
Movies, TV, weather
50
42
53
61
Business, economics, personal finance
46
39
50
53
Science, technology, environment
46
39
49
52
Police, crime, courts, legal
44
38
46
52
Sports
44
41
47
50
Education
43
30
48
50
Parenting, relationships, religion
39
33
42
42
Arts
30
30
27
37
Automotive
27
23
29
33
Popular music
20
22
24
20
Jobs & career
18
22
31
17



 
Opportunity Scores
Editorial Content Area
Overall
Black
Hispanic
White
Easy to Read Content*
67
74
53
75
Community announcements, obituaries, ordinary people
64
69
52
71
Health, home, food, fashion & travel
57
70
52
64
Government, war, politics, international
53
38
40
60
Natural disasters/accidents
51
54
34
56
Movies, TV, weather
50
58
37
56
Business, economics, personal finance
46
61
39
51
Science, technology, environment
46
62
22
52
Police, crime, courts, legal
44
45
40
49
Sports
44
44
34
49
Education
43
49
23
48
Parenting, relationships, religion
39
40
23
43
Arts
30
27
33
33
Automotive
27
32
22
31
Popular music
20
20
14
23
Jobs & career
18
36
0
21

* "Easy to Read" is both a brand perception and an editorial content quality. See our Understanding and Improving "Easy to Read" Content page for more information.




Advertising Content

 
Opportunity Scores
Advertising Content Area
Overall
Men
Women
Ad and inserts for food and groceries
42
44
49
Ads for clothing, health and non-food stores
42
45
49
Ads for entertainment and sporting events
41
49
39
Classified ads
20
26
17



 
Opportunity Scores
Advertising Content Area
Overall
Age 18-35
Age 36-54
Age 55+
Ad and inserts for food and groceries
42
38
40
51
Ads for clothing, health and non-food stores
42
41
45
47
Ads for entertainment and sporting events
41
39
45
44
Classified ads
20
28
29
15



 
Opportunity Scores
Advertising Content Area
Overall
Black
Hispanic
White
Ad and inserts for food and groceries
42
51
46
47
Ads for clothing, health and non-food stores
42
66
47
47
Ads for entertainment and sporting events
41
46
35
47
Classified ads
20
40
14
23



Additional Information

©2010 Readership Institute • 304 Fisk Hall • Northwestern University • 1845 Sheridan Road • Evanston, IL 60208-2110
phone: 847.491.9900 • fax: 847.491.5619 • email: institute@readership.org