Media Management Center      MediaInfoCenter      McCormick Fellows      Kellogg School of Management      Medill

High Potential Readership Opportunities

When the Impact study surveyed 37,000 consumers across the United States about their local newspapers, it found many ways for newspapers to increase readership. Almost every kind of improvement in service, editorial quality, brand perception and advertising quality has the potential to increase customer satisfaction and readership.

But the real challenge isn't coming up with areas to improve, but in prioritizing improvements to make the most of limited resources. If you can't do everything, how do you decide what's most important?

The Readership Institute decided to prioritize opportunities by their potential to get people to actually read the newspaper more. Where will improvements motivate people to spend more time with the newspaper and read more sections more often? These ratings are called opportunity scores.

Not surprisingly, some opportunities have more potential than others. Automotive coverage, for example, has a lower opportunity score than business coverage. In literal terms, this says that increasing satisfaction with business coverage is more likely to increase readership than increasing satisfaction with automotive coverage. If you think about it, it makes sense. Even if most newspapers offered encyclopedic automotive coverage written by world-renown experts, most readers would still only spend a few minutes each day reading it.

We found these opportunity scores to be remarkably consistent across U.S. newspapers. Regardless of circulation size or market circumstance, the relative rankings of each opportunity remain the same. This consistency means that any newspaper can implement these changes with confidence that the instructions apply to it.

The opportunity scores themselves have no inherent meaning -- they are relative scores used to rank areas. Differences of three to four points in an opportunity score also aren't meaningful. Focus on the overall rank of opportunities and differences of more than five points.


 
Opportunity Scores
Content Area
Overall
Men
Women
Brand: Easy to Read
67
74
75
Service: Condition & completeness of paper
65
87
87
Content: Community announcements, obituaries, ordinary people
64
65
75
Service: Quality of paper, ink & typesize
59
81
75
Service: When and how the paper is delivered
58
83
71
Content: Health, home, food, fashion & travel
57
59
66
Brand: Intelligent, successful, experienced
56
64
59
Service: Accuracy of the bill
56
76
71
Service: Cost of home delivery
55
77
70
Service: Customer service
55
74
70
Content: Government, war, politics, international
53
63
52
Brand: Informed, in the know
51
57
54
Brand: Honest, trustworthy, helpful
51
57
54
Content: Natural disasters/accidents
51
58
52
Content: Movies, TV, weather
50
54
54
Community leader, strong personality
49
56
52
Brand: Middle class, neighborly
49
54
54
Brand: Makes me think
48
57
48
Content: Business, economics, personal finance
46
55
48
Content: Science, technology, environment
46
51
49
Brand: Reflects my beliefs, cares about me
46
53
48
Brand: Fun, creative, energetic
45
51
48
Content: Police, crime, courts, legal
44
52
45
Content: Sports
44
53
43
Brand: Belonging, fulfillment
43
48
46
Content: Education
43
45
47
Ad and inserts for food and groceries
42
44
49
Ads for clothing, health and non-food stores
42
45
49
Ads for entertainment and sporting events
41
49
39
Content: Parenting, relationships, religion
39
42
41
Brand: Can be used anywhere, anytime
38
44
41
Content: Arts
30
32
34
Brand: Accurate
30
37
29
Content: Automotive
27
34
27
Content: Popular music
20
24
20
Classified ads
20
26
17
Brand: Conservative
20
--
--
Content: Jobs & career
18
22
18
Brand: Opinionated, arrogant
15
16
17
Brand: Liberal
13
--
--
Brand: Old fashioned
6
--
--



 
Opportunity Scores
Content Area
Overall
Age 18-35
Age 36-54
Age 55+
Brand: Easy to Read
67
61
74
76
Service: Condition & completeness of paper
65
61
81
101
Content: Community announcements, obituaries, ordinary people
64
54
69
73
Service: Quality of paper, ink & typesize
59
67
77
81
Service: When and how the paper is delivered
58
57
70
93
Content: Health, home, food, fashion & travel
57
50
62
64
Brand: Intelligent, successful, experienced
56
51
59
66
Service: Accuracy of the bill
56
53
64
96
Service: Cost of home delivery
55
57
66
89
Service: Customer service
55
52
66
88
Content: Government, war, politics, international
53
44
54
63
Content: Natural disasters/accidents
51
37
53
63
Brand: Informed, in the know
51
43
55
61
Brand: Honest, trustworthy, helpful
51
47
53
59
Content: Movies, TV, weather
50
42
53
61
Brand: Community leader, strong personality
49
38
52
59
Brand: Middle class, neighborly
49
45
51
58
Brand: Makes me think
48
42
50
59
Business, economics, personal finance
46
39
50
53
Content: Science, technology, environment
46
39
49
52
Brand: Reflects my beliefs, cares about me
46
34
48
59
Brand: Fun, creative, energetic
45
46
44
51
Content: Police, crime, courts, legal
44
38
46
52
Content: Sports
44
41
47
50
Content: Education
43
30
48
50
Brand: Belonging, fulfillment
43
37
41
53
Ad and inserts for food and groceries
42
38
40
51
Ads for clothing, health and non-food stores
42
41
45
47
Ads for entertainment and sporting events
41
39
45
44
Content: Parenting, relationships, religion
39
33
42
42
Brand: Can be used anywhere, anytime
38
32
41
49
Brand: Accurate
30
23
30
44
Content: Arts
30
30
27
37
Content: Automotive
27
23
29
33
Content: Popular music
20
22
24
20
Classified ads
20
39
45
44
Brand: Conservative
20
--
--
--
Content: Jobs & career
18
22
31
17
Brand: Opinionated, arrogant
15
21
12
14
Brand: Liberal
13
--
--
--
Brand: Old fashioned
6
--
--
--



 
Opportunity Scores
Content Area
Overall
Black
Hispanic
White
Easy to read
67
74
53
75
Content: Easy to Read Content*
67
74
53
75
Service: Condition & completeness of paper
65
75
51
88
Content: Community announcements, obituaries, ordinary people
64
69
52
71
Service: Quality of paper, ink & typesize
59
70
66
79
Service: When and how the paper is delivered
58
37
66
79
Content: Health, home, food, fashion & travel
57
70
52
64
Service: Accuracy of the bill
56
30
53
77
Brand: Intelligent, successful, experienced
56
57
39
63
Service: Cost of home delivery
55
32
62
75
Service: Customer service
55
35
43
76
Content: Government, war, politics, international
53
38
40
60
Brand: Informed, in the know
51
29
35
57
Brand: Honest, trustworthy, helpful
51
37
21
59
Content: Natural disasters/accidents
51
54
34
56
Content: Movies, TV, weather
50
58
37
56
Brand: Community leader, strong personality
49
52
23
55
Brand: Middle class, neighborly
49
45
24
56
Brand: Makes me think
48
60
49
52
Brand: Reflects my beliefs, cares about me
46
37
38
51
Content: Business, economics, personal finance
46
61
39
51
Content: Science, technology, environment
46
62
22
52
Brand: Fun, creative, energetic
45
43
32
51
Content: Police, crime, courts, legal
44
45
40
49
Content: Sports
44
44
34
49
Content: Education
43
49
23
48
Brand: Belonging, fulfillment
43
36
40
48
Ad and inserts for food and groceries
42
51
46
47
Ads for clothing, health and non-food stores
42
66
47
47
Ads for entertainment and sporting events
41
46
35
47
Content: Parenting, relationships, religion
39
40
23
43
Brand: Can be used anywhere, anytime
38
39
35
42
Accurate
30
42
16
33
Content: Arts
30
27
33
33
Content: Automotive
27
32
22
31
Brand: Conservative
20
--
--
--
Ads: Classified ads
20
40
14
23
Content: Popular music
20
20
14
23
Content: Jobs & career
18
36
0
21
Brand: Opinionated, arrogant
15
33
21
16
Brand: Liberal
13
--
--
--
Brand: Old fashioned
6
--
--
--




Additional Information

©2008 Readership Institute • 301 Fisk Hall • Northwestern University • 1845 Sheridan Road • Evanston, IL 60208-2110
phone: 847.491.9900 • fax: 847.491.5619 • email: institute@readership.org