Media Management Center      MediaInfoCenter      McCormick Fellows      Kellogg School of Management      Medill

High Potential Brand Areas
When the Impact study surveyed 37,000 consumers across the United States about their local newspapers, it found many ways for newspapers to increase readership. Almost every kind of improvement in service, editorial quality, brand perception and advertising quality has the potential to increase customer satisfaction and readership.

But the real challenge isn't coming up with areas to improve, but in prioritizing improvements to make the most of limited resources. If you can't do everything, how do you decide what's most important?

The Readership Institute decided to prioritize opportunities by their ability to get people to actually read the newspaper more. Where will improvements motivate people to spend more time with the newspaper and read more sections more often? These ratings are called opportunity scores.

Not surprisingly, some opportunities have more potential than others. A newspaper that's seen as intelligent, successful and experienced is more likely to increase readership than a newspaper that is seen as being old fashioned.

When we consider brand perceptions, opportunity scores give a general sense of the power of one perception vs. another, but judgment must be used in interpreting them. In all cases, a brand perception has to be seen as relevant to individual readers. In a small, rural market, it may be more important to be seen as middle class and neighborly than being "in the know" - even though both perceptions have the same opportunity score.

Many people ask why "accuracy" appears so low on the list. Accuracy shouldn't be seen as somehow less important because it appears on the bottom. Rather, we believe it means that accuracy is such a fundamental requirement that it can be seen as a threshold issue. You must have it in order to survive, but being accurate will not be enough to build readership going forward.

Across U.S. newspapers we found these opportunity scores to be remarkably consistent. Regardless of circulation size or market circumstance, the relative rankings of each opportunity remain the same. This consistency means that any newspaper can implement these changes with confidence that the insights apply to it.

The opportunity scores themselves have no inherent meaning - they are relative scores used to rank areas. Differences of three to four points in an opportunity score also aren't meaningful. Focus on the overall rank of opportunities and differences of more than five points.


Brand Perceptions
Opportunity Scores
The paper is...
Overall
Men
Women
Easy to read
67
74
75
Intelligent, successful, experienced
56
64
59
Informed, in the know
51
57
54
Honest, trustworthy, helpful
51
57
54
Community leader, strong personality
49
56
52
Middle class, neighborly
49
54
54
Makes me think
48
57
48
Reflects my beliefs, cares about me
46
53
48
Fun, creative, energetic
45
51
48
Belonging, fulfillment
43
48
46
Can be used anywhere, anytime
38
44
41
Accurate
30
37
29
Conservative
20
--
--
Opinionated, arrogant
15
16
17
Liberal
13
--
--
Old fashioned
6
--
--



Brand Perceptions
Opportunity Scores
The paper is...
Overall
Age 18-35
Age 36-54
Age 55+
Easy to read
67
61
74
76
Intelligent, successful, experienced
56
51
59
66
Informed, in the know
51
43
55
61
Honest, trustworthy, helpful
51
47
53
59
Community leader, strong personality
49
38
52
59
Middle class, neighborly
49
45
51
58
Makes me think
48
42
50
59
Reflects my beliefs, cares about me
46
34
48
59
Fun, creative, energetic
45
46
44
51
Belonging, fulfillment
43
37
41
53
Can be used anywhere, anytime
38
32
41
49
Accurate
30
23
30
44
Conservative
20
--
--
--
Opinionated, arrogant
15
21
12
14
Liberal
13
--
--
--
Old fashioned
6
--
--
--



Brand Perceptions
Opportunity Scores
The paper is...
Overall
Black
Hispanic
White
Easy to read
67
74
53
75
Intelligent, successful, experienced
56
57
39
63
Informed, in the know
51
29
35
57
Honest, trustworthy, helpful
51
37
21
59
Community leader, strong personality
49
52
23
55
Middle class, neighborly
49
45
24
56
Makes me think
48
60
49
52
Reflects my beliefs, cares about me
46
37
38
51
Fun, creative, energetic
45
43
32
51
Belonging, fulfillment
43
36
40
48
Can be used anywhere, anytime
38
39
35
42
Accurate
30
42
16
33
Conservative
20
--
--
--
Opinionated, arrogant
15
33
21
16
Liberal
13
--
--
--
Old fashioned
6
--
--
--




Additional Information

©2010 Readership Institute • 304 Fisk Hall • Northwestern University • 1845 Sheridan Road • Evanston, IL 60208-2110
phone: 847.491.9900 • fax: 847.491.5619 • email: institute@readership.org